Push and Pull Factor: Determining the visitors' satisfactions at urban recreational area

Main Article Content

Noralizawati Mohamed
Noriah Othman

Abstract

This study investigates the visitors' satisfaction at the most popular urban recreational area, Kepong Metropolitan Park, Selangor. It presents the analysis and synthesis of information collected from an open-ended survey. Selected visitors were asked to state their opinions regarding the overall scene and the answers were summarized and categorized in terms of several dimensions. As a result, the researcher found that the visitors expressed several comments and suggestions that could be used as push and pull factors in determining their satisfaction with the recreational area. These two-dimensional phenomenons are very useful as references to researchers or designers to identify and fulfil the visitors' satisfaction for future preparation of recreational areas.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Mohamed, N. and Othman, N. 2016. Push and Pull Factor: Determining the visitors’ satisfactions at urban recreational area. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies. 1, 1 (Dec. 2016), 79–86. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21834/aje-bs.v1i1.169.

References

Azlin, Y., & Sabri, N. (1997). Forest recreation environment: Visitors preferences and perceptions. FRIM, 1(1), 1-12.

Bell, S. (1993). Elements of visual design in the landscape. E & FN Spon.

Bevlin, M. E. (1994). Design through discovery: The elements and principles. Harcourt Brace College Pub.

Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 129-138.

Coeterier, F., Ploeger, B., Schone, M. B., & Buijs, A. (1997). Perception of the Waddensea area: Investigating the values of visitors and inhabitants. In Chiesura, A., The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 129-138.

Cohen, D., McKenzie, T., Sehgal, A., & Williamson, S. (2007). Contribution of public parks to physical activity. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 509-514.

Daunmants, L. (2003). Factors affecting visual preferences for naturalization and restoration in urban park landscapes. Dissertation Abstracts International (UMI No. 766661971). Retrieved September 19, 2007 http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit766661971.

Dawson, J. R. (1988). (December, 1988).Aesthetic factors to consider in the placement and selection of trees. Turf Craft Australia, 44-47. Retrieved October 19, 2007, from http://www.envirolinks.com.au/articles.html.

Hull, R. B., & Harvey, A. (1989). Explaining the emotion people experience in suburban parks. Environment and Behavior, 21 (3), 323-345.

Ismail, N. (2002). Professional handbook for landscape architect. Institute of Landscape Architects Malaysia Pub.

Jorgenson, A., Hitchmough, J., & Calvert, T. (2002). Woodland spaces and adges: Their impact on perception of safety and preference. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60, 135-150.

Kaplan, R. (1984). Impact of urban nature: A theoretical analysis. Urban ecology, 8, 189-197.

Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mustafa, K. M. S. (1994). A cross- cultural comparison of visual landscape preferences for the natural environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University.

Nor’ A aini, O., & Kamarul Ain, K. (2007, November). Keeping the green in urban area: An approach towards sustainable development. Paper presented at the Seminar Kebangsaan Rupabandar Malaysia, Perak, Malaysia.

Oku, H., & Fukamachi, K. (2006). The differences in scenic perception of forest visitors through their attributes and recreational activity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 34- 42.

Ozguner, H., & Kendle, A. D. (2006). Public attitudes towards naturalistic versus designed landscapes in the city of Sheffield (UK). Landscape and Urban Planning, 74, 139- 157.

Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Sreetheran, M., & Kamariah, D. (2007). Performance indicators to evaluate urban parks from the saftey and security perspective. Paper presented at the Seminar Kebangsaan Rupabandar Malaysia from 28th to 29th November 2007. Lumut, Perak.

Todorova, A., Asakawa, S., & Aikoh, T. (2004). Preferences for and attitudes towards street flowers and trees in Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 403- 416.