Choice Behaviour of Housing Attributes: Theory and measurement

Main Article Content

Bako Zachariah Zinas
Mahmud Mohd Jusan


Preferences and choices in society are constant dynamic operations, made based on the behavioural dynamism of people. In this cosmic dynamism, they keep shifting from one stage to another, within the same cosmic space. Housing preferences and choices, like any other life interests, therefore operate within this framework. Unlike merchandised product brands, housing brands are hardly known, probably because of the heterogeneous nature of the housing product - the house. However, very little is known about the relevant housing attributes (refer to page 7). Housing preferences and choices operate within the framework of preferences and choices for housing attributes. In any preference and choice activity, there are underlying motivations that make it possible for an individual to choose from available alternatives within a given product field. This paper examines and outlines the methodological and theoretical framework of housing preferences and choices, based on the theory of means-end chain (MEC). Previous MEC applications in the field of architecture and urban design have been very useful and successful. The paper attempts to explore from the literature the possibility of extending the previous methods and their applicability in the design process. In dealing with user preference for housing, there is a need for research for the development of a technological tool to identify user needs and preferences, and the kind of decision support that is required to identify these needs.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zinas, B.Z. and Mohd Jusan, M. 2017. Choice Behaviour of Housing Attributes: Theory and measurement. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies. 2, 2 (Jan. 2017), 23–37. DOI:


Bannister, D., & Mair, J. M. M. (1968). The Evaluation of Personal Construct. London: Academic Press.

Blaauboer, M., & Clara H. Mulder (2007). Residential Choice and Attitudes towards Family and Work. Amsterdam: University of Amsterda.

Block, A. (1946). Estimating Housing Needs. London: The Architectural Press.

Boer de, M. M., B. McCarthy. (2004). Means-End Chain Theory Applied to Irish Convenience Food Consumers. Cork: National University of Ireland.

Botschen, G., Thelen, E. M., & Pieters, R. (1999). Using Means-End Structures for Benefit Segmentation and Application to Services. European Journal of Marketing, 33(1-2), 38-58.

Coolen, H., and Hoekstra, J., (2001). Values as Determinants of Preferences for Housing Attributes. Journal of Housing and Built Environment 16, 285-306.

Coolen, H., Boelhouwer, P., and Kees, V. D. (2002). Values and goals as determinants of intended tenure choice. Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 17, 215-236.

Costa, A. I. A., M. Dekker and W. M. F., Jongen. (2004). An overview of means-endtheory: potential application in consumer-oriented food product design. Trends in Food Science & Technology (15), 403-415.

Dibley, A., & Baker, S. (2001). Uncovering the Links between Brand Choice and Personal Values among Young British and Spanish Girls. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 1(1), 77-93.

Dieleman, F. M. (1996). Modeling Housing Choice. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (11), 201-207.

Gengler, C. E., & Reynolds, T. (1995). Consumer Understanding and Advertising Strategy: Analysis and Strategic Translation of Laddering Data. Journal of Advertising Research, 35(4), 19-32.

Gengler, C. E., Mulvey, M. S., & Oglethorpe, J. E. (1999). A Means-End Analysis of Mother’s Infant Feeding Choices. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 18(2), 172-188.

Grunert, K. G., & Grunert S. C. (1995). Measuring subjective meaning structures by the laddering method: theoretical considerations and methodological problems. International Journal of Research in Marketing (12), 209-225.

Gutman, J. (1982). A Means-End Chain Model based on Consumer Categorization Processes. Journal of Marketing, 46, 60-72.

Hawlev, M. (2009). Laddering: A Research Interview Technique for Uncovering Core Values: Research That Works.

Hinkle, D. (1965). The Change of Personal Constructs from the viewpoint of Theory of Construct Application: Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.

Kaciak, E., & C. W., Cullen. (2006). Analysis of means-end chain data in marketing research. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing (15), 12-