Place Attachment and Continuity of Urban Place Identity

Main Article Content

Norsidah Ujang


This paper focused on place attachment and its significance in defining place identity with reference to three main shopping streets in the city center of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Place identity refers to the identification of emotions and feelings about a particular place and the distinctive characteristics of the place in which human-place bonding is developed. The weakening of place identity has been identified as one of the urban design issues for contemporary cities. This paper identified the issues concerning place identity; concepts of place and place attachment constructs, the identification of place attachment constructs and place attributes that could be used as assessment indicators for future redevelopment of local urban places. A questionnaire survey and interviews were conducted to examine place attachment and to identify the characteristics of the places that exerted influence and would then benefit in terms of securing place identity which in turn sustained attraction and thus brought greater economic and tourism advantages to the city.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ujang, N. 2017. Place Attachment and Continuity of Urban Place Identity. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies. 2, 2 (Jan. 2017), 117–132. DOI:


Altman, I and Low, S. (1992). Place attachment. New York: Plenum Press.

Arefi, M. (1999). “Non-place and placelessness as narratives of loss: Rethinking the notion of place”, Journal of Urban Design, 4 (2), pp.179-193.

Bentley, I; Alcock, A.; McGlynn, S; Murrain, P. Smith, G.. (1992). Responsive environments: A manual for designers. Butterworth Architecture : Oxford.

Carmona, M. et al. (2003). Public spaces – Urban places : The dimensions of urban design. Architecture Press.

Carr, Stephen, Francis, M., Rivlin, G.L. and Stone, M.A. (1992). Public space. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

DBKL (2004). Draft Kuala Lumpur Structure Plan 2020. City Hall of Kuala Lumpur.

Dolbani, M. (2000). Responsive public open spaces in the city centre of Kuala Lumpur.

Unpublished PHD thesis. JCUD, Oxford Brookes University.

Gustafson, P. (2001). Meanings of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 5-16.

Hidalgo, M.C; Hernandez, B. (2001). “Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical question”, Journal Of Environmental Psychology, 21, pp 273-281.

Hull, B.R.; Lam, M.; Vigo, G. (1994). “Place identity : Symbols of self in the urban fabric”. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 28, pg 109-120

Jacobs, A. (1999). Great streets. Mass: MIT Press.

Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities: The failure of modern town planning. London: Peregrine Books.

JBPD (2006). National Urbanisation Policy. Federal Department of Town and Country Planning. (JBPD), Peninsular Malaysia.

Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Mass: MIT Press.

Lynch, K. (1998). Good city form. Mass: MIT Press.

Mohammed Abdullah E.S. (1998). “The integration of tradition and modernit : A search for an urban and architectural identity in Ar-Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia”. Habitat International, Vol. 22, No.4, pp. 571-589.

Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design 3 (1), pp 93-116.

Proshansky, H. M., A. K. Fabian and R. Kaminoff (1995). Place identity: Physical world socialisation of the self, giving places meaning. Readings in Environmental Psychology, pp 87-113.

Rapoport, A. (1977). Human aspects of urban form: Towards man-environment approach to urban form and design. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.

Rose, G. (1995). Place and identity: A sense of place. In Massey, D. and Jess, P. (eds) A place in the world: Places, cultures and globalization. (pp. 87–132). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shamai, S. (1991). Sense of place: An empirical measurement. Geoforum, 22(3), 347-358.

Stedman, C.R. (2003). “Is it really just a social construction?: The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place”, Society and Natural Resources, 16, pp 671-685.

Shuhana, S. et al. (2004). Kriteria kejayaan jalan membeli-belah tradisi di Malaysi : Kajian kes Kuala Lumpur. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Stokols, D. and Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People in places : A transactional view of settings. In Harvey, J. H. (Ed.). Cognition social behaviour and the environment. (pp 441-488) Hillsdale, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.

Williams, D,R. , Anderson, B.S. , Mc Donald C.D. and Patterson, M.E. (1995). Measuring place attachment: More prelimenary results. Paper presented at the 1995 Leisure Research Symposium, NRPA Congress, San Antonio.