Participatory Planning Approach to Urban Conservation and Regeneration in Amphawa Community, Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this article is to examine the participatory planning approach to urban conservation and regeneration in Amphawa Community, Thailand which includes a series of interrelated projects starting from 2000 until the present. The action research procedure is adopted and various public participation techniques are applied intensively throughout the planning process. In addition, 'Amphawa Model', the community conservation and regeneration model are developed to help direct all strategies and policies. Urban conservation and regeneration of Amphawa Community are very successful, making it an excellent case study for urban conservation and regeneration planning at the local level.
Article Details
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Wannasilpa Peerapun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. JAIP, 35(4), 216-224.
ICOMOS. (2003). Charters for the Conservation of Historic Towns and Urban Area (Washington Charter 1987). [WWW page]. URL http://www.international.icomos. org/charters/towns_e.htm
International Association of Public Participation. (2007). IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation. [WWW page]. URL http://www.iap2.org/associations/4748/files/ spectrum.pdf
Mongsawad, P. (2009). Sufficiency Economy: A Contribution to Development Theory. International Journal of Human and Social science, 4(2), 144-151.
O’Brien, R. (2001). Um exame da abordagem metodológica da pesquisa ação [An Overview of the Ethodological Approach of Action Research]. In Roberto Richardson (Ed.), Teoria e Prática da Pesquisa Ação [Theory and Practice of Action Research]. João Pessoa, Brazil: Universidade Federal da Paraíba. (English Version). [WWW page]. URL http://www. web.ca/ ~robrien/papers/arfinal.html
ODPM. (2003). Participatory Planning for Sustainable Communities: International Experience in Mediation, Negotiation and Engagement in Making Plans. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
Peerapun, W. (2009). Changes in the Use of Canalside Buildings on Amphawa Canal, Samut Songkhram Province: The Consequences of Conservation and Development Project from 2001 to 2009. Nahhara. Journal of Oriental Design and Planning, 5, 23-38.
Peerapun, W. (2011). Urban Conservation and Regeneration in Amphawa Community, Samut Songkhram Province. Manuscript.
Peerapun, W. and Silapacharanan, S. (2011). Conservation and Regeneration of Amphawa Community, Samut Songkhram Province. Sufficiency Economy Series 2 (pp. 153-184). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Susman, G. I. (1983). Action Research: A Sociotechnical Systems Perspective.(pp. 95- 113). In G. Morgan (Ed.). Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Science Research (pp. 95-113). London: Sage Publications.
UNESCO. (2005). Four Dimensions of Sustainable Development. [WWW page]. URL http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/ TLSF/theme_a/mod04/uncom04t01s03.htm
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. (The Brundtland Commission Report). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
WWF. (2005). Cross-Cutting Tool, Stakeholder Analysis. A resource to support the implementation of the WWF Standards of Conservation Project and Programme Management. [WWW page]. URL https://intranet.panda.org/ documents/folder. cfm?uFolderID=60976