Adaptability of Folkways: Buddhist Thai vernacular houses of Songkhla Lake Basin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21834/aje-bs.v3i9.296Abstract
This research has explored the relationships between community ecosystems and folkways in the context of modern development, especially how these relationships are manifested in the changing physical characteristics of their vernacular houses. Using qualitative methods and a holistic approach to study tradition and change, three Thai-Buddhist communities around Songkhla Lake Basin were selected for comparative study. Data were derived from documentary sources, direct and participant observation, in-depth interviews and architectural drawings. It was found that the traditional communities in different local micro-ecosystems were transformed to be a new characteristic of Southern Thai dwellings underlying the emergence of a hybrid economy and society. However, kinship ties, their Buddhist beliefs and their experience of adaptability reinforce the existence of local identities.
References
Bloch, E. (1997).“Nonsynchronism and the obligation to its dialectics”, New German Critique, 11, 22-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/487802
Boeke, J.H. (1953). Economics and Economic Policy of Dual Societies as Exemplified by Indonesia. New York: Institute of Pacific Relations.
Ganjanapan, A. (2001). Complex methods of communities’ research: Dynamics and potential of communities in the development. Bangkok: The Thailand Research Fund. [Thai book]
Jarernsinolarn, C. (2002). Development discourse: power, knowledge, truth, identity, and otherness. Bangkok: Vipasa Press. [Thai book]
Mann, M. (1986). The sources of social power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570896
Nartsupha, C. & Lertvicha, P. (1998). Thai cultural villages. Bangkok: Srang-San Press. [Thai book]
Nederveen Pieterse, J.P. (1995). “Globalization as hybridisation”, in Global Modernities, Eds M. Featherstone, S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250563.n3
Lash, R. Robertson. London: Sage, 45-68.
Noparatnaraporn, C. (2004). “Transforming ‘unbounded’ nature: the evolution of a Thai cultural landscape”. Ranaeang, 4, 204-215.
Noparatnaraporn, C. & King, R. (2007). “Memory or Nostalgia: The Imagining of Everyday Bangkok”. SOJOURN, 22(1), 57-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/SJ22-1C
Panin, O. (2008). Thai-Tai vernacular house. Bangkok: The Thailand Research Fund. [Thai book]
Pisuttirattananon, M. & Maneechod, C. (1992). Southern Thai vernacular houses. Songkhla: The Institute for Southern Thai Studies, Thaksin University. [Thai book]
Pongpaiboon, S. (1993). “Constraints and cultural factors with the development of communities around Songkhla Lake”. Thaksinkadee Journal, 3(1), October-March, 55-66. [Thai paper]
Pongpaiboon, S. (1999). “Southern Thai vernacular house”. Southern Thai Cultural Encyclopaedia, 16: 7704-7721. [Thai book]
Rapoport, A. (1969). House form and culture. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Rapoport, A. (1994). “Spatial organization and the built environment”. Companion encyclopaedia of anthropology. London and New York: Routledge, 460-502.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Supawadee Chuapram, Ornsiri Panin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
