Student Furniture Design as Behavioral and Local Business Resources
Main Article Content
Abstract
Student life is unique as they begin to have more freedom than children in seeking various kinds of needs for living. This study analyzes how students live and work in relation to the need for room furniture, and how small local furniture traders face problems in response to that need. From interviews, questionnaires involving 123 students and the use of descriptive statistics and the Chi-square test, it was found that male and female students prefer furniture that is affordable, simple, natural, multifunction and durable, besides light, practical and flexible. A new model was proposed to solve the traders' business problem.
Article Details
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Prabu Wardono, R. Susanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Abercrombie, S. (1990). A Philosophy of interior design. New York: Harper & Row Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research. (2010). Estimating the effects of dormitory living on student performance (CAEPR working paper #002-2010). Bloomington, Indiana: De Araujo, P. and Murray, J.
Clemons, S.A. et al. (2005). The Importance of sense of place and sense of self in residence hall room design: A qualitative study of first year. Journal of the First-year Experience and Students in Transition, 17 (2), 73-86.
Gosling, S.D. et al. (2005). The personal living space cue inventory: An analysis and evaluation. Environment and Behavior, 37 (5), 683-705.
Mehrabian, A., & Rusell, J.A. (1974). An Approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
McDonald, M. & Dunbar, I. (1998). Market Segmentation: how to do it, how to profit from it. London: Macmillan Press.
Taylor, R.B. & Stough, R.R. (1978) Teritorial cognition: assessing Altman’s Typology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(4), 418-423.