Focus Group Discussion on Youth Participation in Vertical Housing Neighbourhood Space
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Focus group discussion series was set up at the vertical housing of Kerinchi People Housing Project, Lembah Pantai with two different groups in separate venues and times. The analysis was done by using Atlas.ti after transcribing and coding the audio-taped discussion, searching for networking on youth participation. The findings show youth demand indoor space compared to outdoor space due to open space inadequacy and absence of space quality yet lost the sense of belonging. Furthermore, the residents' committee neglected youth participation in the decision-making process or meeting with the committee has resulted in the youth not participating in the community actively.
Article Details
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Benner, A. D., Boyle, A. E., & Sadler, S. (2016). Parental involvement and adolescents’ educational success: The roles of prior achievement and socioeconomic status. Journal of youth and adolescence, 45(6), 1053-1064.
Browning, C. R., & Soller, B. (2014). Moving beyond neighborhood: Activity spaces and ecological networks as contexts for youth development. Cityscape (Washington, DC), 16(1), 165.
Chitrakar, R. M., Baker, D. C., & Guaralda, M. (2016). Urban growth and development of contemporary neighbourhood public space in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Habitat International, 53, 30-38.
Crean, H. F. (2012). Youth activity involvement, neighborhood adult support, individual decision-making skills, and early adolescent delinquent behaviors: Testing a conceptual model. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 175–188.
Collingridge D.S. & Gantt E.E. (2008) The quality of qualitative research. American Journal of Medical Quality 23(5), 389–395.
Eusuf, M. A., Mohit, M. a., Eusuf, M. M. R. S., & Ibrahim, M. (2014). Impact of Outdoor Environment to the Quality of Life. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 639–654.
Forrest-bank, S. S., Nicotera, N., Anthony, E. K., & Jenson, J. M. (2015). Children and Youth Services Review
Finding their Way : Perceptions of risk , resilience , and positive youth development among adolescents and young adults from public housing neighborhoods, 55, 147–158.
Gidlow, C. J., Ellis, N. J., & Bostock, S. (2012). Development of the neighbourhood green space tool (NGST). Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(4), 347-358.
Kasim, R. S. R., Zulkharnain, A., Hashim, Z., Ibrahim, W. N. W., & Yusof, S. E. (2014). Regenerating youth development through entrepreneurship. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 322-327.
Li, H., Liebenberg, L., & Ungar, M. (2015). Children and Youth Services Review Understanding service provision and utilization for vulnerable youth : Evidence from multiple informants, 56, 18–25.
Marouf, N., Che-Ani, A. I., Tawil, N. M., Johar, S., & Tahir, M. M. (2015). Development of designing criteria in children’s urban play space in Iran-review of literature. Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(2), 113.
Nyambe, A., Van Hal, G., & Kampen, J. K. (2016). Screening and vaccination as determined by the Social Ecological Model and the Theory of Triadic Influence: a systematic review. BMC public health, 16(1), 1166.
Sanders, J., & Munford, R. (2014). Youth-centred practice: Positive youth development practices and pathways to better outcomes for vulnerable youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 46, 160–167.
Schmid, K. L., Phelps, E., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Constructing positive futures: modeling the relationship between adolescents’ hopeful future expectations and intentional self regulation in predicting positive youth development. Journal of adolescence, 34(6), 1127–35.
Sherry, C. (2017). Accommodating children’s activities in the shared spaces of high-density and master-planned developments. Designing Cities with Children and Young People: Beyond Playgrounds and Skate Parks, 123.
Twohig P.L. & Putnam W. (2002) Group interviews in primary care research: advancing the state of the art or ritualized research? Family Practice 19(3), 278–284.
Van Cauwenberg, J., Cerin, E., Timperio, A., Salmon, J., Deforche, B., & Veitch, J. (2015). Park proximity, quality and recreational physical activity among mid-older aged adults: moderating effects of individual factors and area of residence. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 46.
Van Loon, J., Frank, L. D., Nettlefold, L., & Naylor, P.-J. (2014). Youth physical activity and the neighbourhood environment: examining correlates and the role of neighbourhood definition. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 104, 107–15.
Vilhelmson, B., Thulin, E., & Elldér, E. (2017). Where does time spent on the Internet come from? Tracing the influence of information and communications technology use on daily activities. Information, Communication & Society, 20(2), 250-263.
Yeshpanova, D., Narbekova, G., Biyekenova, N., Kuchinskaya, J., & Mukanova, O. (2014). Social Activity of Youth in Social and Cultural Measurement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 109–114.
Zieff, S. G., Chaudhuri, A., & Musselman, E. (2016). Creating neighborhood recreational space for youth and children in the urban environment: Play (ing in the) Streets in San Francisco. Children and youth services review, 70, 95-101.