The Empowerment of Social Capital in the Malay Traditional Settelement
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Good social capital development allows for discussions to explore what makes a self-sustaining settlement by the locals. This kind of discussion includes the opportunity to speak out and to be part of a development process that is involved in the local settlement. However, many issues have been identified towards making sustainable community developments a success, especially in settlements with high heritage values. This paper seeks to devise solutions to issues identified with regard to development occurred in Kuala Terengganu. Knowledge of these issues may provide a useful guide for future social capital developments in a place with high heritage values.
Article Details
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ahn, M. Y. (2017). Sense of belonging as an indicator for social capital: a mixed methods analysis of students’ sense of belonging to university (Doctoral dissertation, Prifysgol Bangor University).
Armeni, C. (2016). Participation in environmental decision-making: reflecting on planning and community benefits for major wind farms. Journal of Environmental Law, 28(3), 415-441.
Boerebach, J. J. (2012). Sense of place: attachement to, identity with and dependence of shopping locations.
Brundtland, G. (1987). Our common future: Report of the 1987 World Commission on Environment and Development. United Nations, Oslo, 1, 59.
Claridge, T. (2018). What is Bonding Social Capital, https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/what-is-bonding-socialcapital/ [accessed 17 September 2018]
Claridge, T. (2018). What is Bridging Social Capital, https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/what-is-bridging-socialcapital/ [accessed 18 September 2018]
Claridge, T. (2018). What is Linking Social Capital, https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/what-is-linking-socialcapital/ [accessed 18 September 2018]
Claridge, T., 2004. Designing social capital sensitive participation methodologies. Report, Social Capital Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Community Values and Attitude. (2015). Careerforce (Community Support Services ITO Ltd), https://library.careerforce.org.nz/Learning%20Assessment%20Resources/LG28523-1.0.pdf [accessed on 8 January 2019]
Fu, C., Wang, C., Yang, F., Cui, D., Wang, Q., & Mao, Z. (2018). Association between social capital and physical activity among community-dwelling elderly in Wuhan, China. International Journal of Gerontology, 12(2), 155-159.
Gow D, Vansant J (1983) Beyond the rhetoric of rural development participation: How can it be done? World Development 11, 427-443.
Harun, N. Z., Zakariya, K., Mansor, M., & Zakaria, K. (2014). Determining attributes of urban plaza for social sustainability. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 153, 606-615.
Kelly K, Van Vlaenderen H (1995) Evaluating participation processes in community development. Evaluation and Program Planning 18, 371-383.
Kolavalli S, Kerr J (2002) Scaling up participatory watershed development in India. Development & Change 33, 213-235.
Kolodziejski, A. L. (2014). Connecting People and Place: Sense of Place and Local Action.
Mokthsim, N., & Salleh, K. O. (2014). Malaysia's Efforts toward Achieving a Sustainable Development: Issues, Challenges and Prospects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 120, 299-307.
Mubita, A., Libati, M. & Mulonda, M. (2017). The Importance and Limitations of Participation in Development Projects and Programmes. European Scientific Journal, 13(5), 238-251.
Murzyn-Kupisz, M., & Działek, J. (2013). Cultural heritage in building and enhancing social capital. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 35-54.
Nocca, F. (2017). The role of cultural heritage in sustainable development: Multidimensional indicators as decisionmaking tool. Sustainability, 9(10), 1882.
Nour, A. M. (2011). Challenges and advantages of community participation as an approach for sustainable urban development in Egypt. Journal of sustainable development, 4(1), 79.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness (Vol. 1). Pion.
Sakhaeifar, A., & Ghoddusifar, S. H. (2016). Impact of Location-Behavior on Sense of Belonging to Place. Modern Applied Science, 10(5), 57.
Samsudin, N. A. (2014, August). The Physical Design Attributes of Traditional Malay Kampong in Kampung Tanjung
Bunut, Kuala Terengganu. In 5th International Graduate Conference on Engineering, Science & Humanity (pp. 19-21).
Stedman, R. C. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and behavior, 34(5), 561-581.
Summit, E. (1992). Agenda 21. The United Nations programme for action from Rio. Tuan, Y. F. (1974). Topophilia (p. 260).
Tucunan, K. P., & Medha, A. N. (2018, November). Social sustainability indicators in kampung; dialogue between Ibn Khaldun’s Tamadun concepts and sustainable developments approaches. In IOP Conference Series: Earth andEnvironmental Science ( Vol. 202, No. 1, p. 012073). IOP Publishing.
Ujang, N., & Zakariya, K. (2015). The notion of place, place meaning and identity in urban regeneration. Procediasocial and behavioral sciences, 170, 709-717.
Ujang, N., Moulay, A., & Zakariya, K. (2015). Sense of well-being indicators: Attachment to public parks in Putrajaya, Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 202, 487-494.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our Common Future, UN Documents Cooperation Circles, http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm, [accessed 12 April 2018]