Flat Layouts and Children Outdoor Activities

Authors

  • Azhan Abdul Aziz Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak
  • Abdullah Sani Ahmad Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21834/aje-bs.v2i3.189

Keywords:

Low Cost Flats, Outdoor Space, Children Activities

Abstract

In Malaysia's urban peripheries, where residential development still has room to expand, walk-up flats have become a popular form of low-cost housing because of their relatively low construction and maintenance costs to match the required demand of the increasing urban poor. In this housing type, standardization and spatial efficiency result in minimum dwelling space, causing life to spill to the outdoors which then becomes a vital social space for children. Appropriations of the space are an integral part of children's growing up and social experiences. The paper explores the differences in children's outdoor activities near the homes in relation to the different low-cost flat layouts through a comparative observational study. Different flat configurations were found to offer different spatial affordances for children's social experiences which could inform design decisions.

References

Abu-Ghazzeh, T. (1999). Housing layout, social interaction, and the place of contact in Abu-Nuseir, Jordan. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), 41-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0106

Becker, F. D. (1976). Children’s Play in Multifamily Housing Environment and Behavior, 8(4), 545-574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657684004

Chua, B. (1991). Modernism and the vernacular: transformation of public spaces and social life in Singapore. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 8(3), 203-222.

Churchman, A., & Ginsberg, Y. (1984). The image and experience of high rise housing in Israel. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4(1), 27-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(84)80017-1

Evans, G. W. (2006). Child Development and the Physical Environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 423-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190057

Gillis, A. R. (1977). High-rise housing and psychological strain. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 18(December), 418-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2955349

Ginsberg, Y., & Churchman, A. (1985). The pattern and meaning of neighbor relations in high-rise housing in Israel. Human Ecology, 13(4), 467-484. Government of Malaysia (2005). Ninth Malaysia Plan, 2006-2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531155

Hattie, J., Marsh, H., Neill, J., & Richards, G. (1997). Adventure education and Outward Bound: Out-of-class experiences that make a lasting difference. Review of Educational Research, 43-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001043

Holland, C., Clark, A., Katz, J., & Peace, S. (2007). Social interactions in urban public places. Bristol, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Huang, S. (2006). A study of outdoor interactional spaces in high-rise housing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(3), 193-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.07.008

Jacobs, J. (2002). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. In G. Bridge & S. Watson (Eds.), The Blackwell City Reader (pp. 351-356). New York Blackwell Publishing

Downloads

Published

2017-04-01

How to Cite

[1]
Abdul Aziz, A. and Ahmad, A.S. 2017. Flat Layouts and Children Outdoor Activities. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies. 2, 3 (Apr. 2017), 57–66. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21834/aje-bs.v2i3.189.