Indicating Users' Risk in Building Performance Evaluation for University Buildings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21834/aje-bs.v3i10.312Keywords:
Higher Education Buildings, Building Performance, Risk, Users’ FeedbackAbstract
Higher education building (HEB) is believed to be key functional. It spawns not only the environment but also human and economic resources. Initially, the growing student population with various learning activities has constituted risk emergence, inefficient energy use and climate discomfort. Thus, it decreases the yearly total performance of the building. To sustain building efficiency, Building Performance Evaluation (BPE) plays a vital role to improve performance issues in HEB. Hence, this paper explores the significance of users' feedback as the concept of building performance. This paper also describes the literature on the HEB's background including risk factors and performance issues.
References
Almeida, N., Sousa, V., Alves Dias, L., & Branco, F. (2010). A framework for combining risk-management and performance-based building approaches. Building Research & Information, 38(2), 157–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210903516719
Altan, H. (2010). Energy efficiency interventions in UK higher education institutions. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7722–7731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.024
Amaratunga, D., & Baldry, D. (1998). Appraising the total performance of higher education buildings: A participatory approach towards a knowledge- base system. In Construction and Building Research Conference 1998 : Proceedings (COBRA) 2nd-3rd September 1998, Oxford Brookes University (pp. 1–17).
Amaratunga, D., & Baldry, D. (1999). Building Performance Evaluation In Higher Education Properties: Towards A Process Model. In COBRA 1999.
Amole, D. (2008). Residential satisfaction in students ’ housing q. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.006
Badayai, A. R. A. (2012). A Theoretical Framework and Analytical Discussion on Uncongenial Physical Workplace Environment and Job Performance among Workers in Industrial Sectors. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 42(July 2010), 486–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.214
Bordass, B., & Leaman, A. (2005). Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 1: A portfolio of feedback techniques. Building Research & Information, 33(4), 347–352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210500162016
Cohen, R., Standeven, M., Leaman, A., & Bordass, B. (2001). Assessing building performance in use 1 : the Probe process. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 85–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210010008018
Cole, R. J. (2000). Building environmental assessment methods : assessing construction practices. Construction Management and Economics, 18(8), 949–957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900446902
Doidge, C. (2001). “Post Occupancy Evaluation.” Architectural Education Exchange 2001. Retrieved November 15, 2009, from http://cebe.cf.ac.uk/aee/abstracts/aee.html
Douglas, J. (1996). Building performance and its relevance to facilities management. Facilities, 14(April), 23–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02632779610112508
Edwards, B. (2000). University Architecture. Spoon Press (Taylor & Francis Group), UK.
Gillen, A., Wright, A., & Spink, L. (2011). Student perceptions of a positive climate for learning: a case study. Educational Psychology in Practice, 27(1), 65–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2011.549355
Government of Malaysia. (2011). Tenth Malaysia Plan (2011-2015). Jabatan Percetakan Negara, Kuala Lumpur.
Haapio, A., & Viitaniemi, P. (2008). A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(7), 469–482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.01.002
Harb, N., & El-Shaarawi, A. (2006). Factors Affecting Students’ Performance (No. 13621) (pp. 1–17). Al-Ain, UAE. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/13621/
Hassanain, M. A. (2007). Post-Occupancy Indoor Environmental Quality Evaluation of Student Housing Facilities. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 3(4), 249–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2007.9684646
Isnin, Z., Ahmad, S. S., & Yahya, Z. (2013). Lessons Learned from Exposure to Building Materials. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 85, 128–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.345
James, P., & Hopkinson, P. (2004). Sustainable Buildings Can Benefit Higher Education - A Briefing Paper. Retrieved January 10, 2011, from www.heepi.org.uk
Khalil, N., Husin, H. N., & Nawawi, A. H. (2012). An Analytical Literature: Strategic Improvement of Sustainable
Building Performance Tool for Malaysia’s Higher Institutions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36(June 2011), 306–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.034
Khalil, N., Husin, H. N., & Zakaria, S. R. (2010). Performance Evaluation of Indoor Environment towards Sustainability for Higher Educational Buildings. In The 8th JTEFS/BBCC conference “Sustainable Development. Culture. Education”, 17-19 May 2010, Paris, France.
Lützkendorf, T., & Lorenz, D. (2007). Integrating sustainability into property risk assessments for market transformation. Building Research & Information, 35(6), 644–661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701446374
Lützkendorf, T., & Lorenz, D. P. (2006). Using an integrated performance approach in building assessment tools. Building Research & Information, 34(4), 334–356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210600672914
Mat, S., Sopian, K., Mokhtar, M., Ali, B., Hashim, H. S., Rashid, A. K. A., … Abdullah, N. G. (2009). Managing Sustainable Campus in Malaysia - Organisational Approach and Measures. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 201–214.
Mcdougall, G., Kelly, J. R., Hinks, J., & Bititci, U. S. (2002). A review of the leading performance measurement tools for assessing buildings. Journal of Facilities Management, 1(2), 142–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14725960310807881
Meacham, B., Bowen, R., Traw, J., & Moore, A. (2005). Performance-based building regulation: current situation and future needs. Building Research & Information, 33(2), 91–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321042000322780
Meacham, B. J. (2010). Risk-informed performance-based approach to building regulation. Journal of Risk Research, 13(7), 877–893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669871003703260
Najib, N. ‘Ulyani M., Yusof, N. A., & Abidin, N. Z. (2011). Student residential satisfaction in research universities. Journal of Facilities Management, 9(3), 200–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961111148108
Olanrewaju, A. A. L., Khamidi, M. F., & Idrus, A. (2010). Appraisal of the building maintenance management practices of Malaysian universities. Journal of Building Appraisal, 6(3/4), 261–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jba.2011.3
Olanrewaju, A. L. (2010). Case for alternative approach to building maintenance management of public universities. Journal of Building Appraisal, 5(3), 201–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jba.2009.19
Olanrewaju, A. L., Khamidi, M. F., & Idrus, A. (2010a). Building Maintenance Management in a Malaysian University Campuses : A Case Study. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 10(1/2), 76–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5130/ajceb.v10i1/2.1593
Olanrewaju, A. L., Khamidi, M. F., & Idrus, A. (2010b). Quantitative analysis of defects in Malaysian university buildings : Providers ’. Journal of Retail & Leisure Property, 9(2), 137–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/rlp.2010.2
Sapri, M., & Muhammad, S. (2010). Monitoring energy performance in higher education buildings for sustainable campus. Malaysian Journal of Real Estate, 5(1), 1–25.
Shabha, G. (2004). An assessment of the effectiveness of e-learning on university space planning and design. Facilities, 22(3/4), 79–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770410527815
Shafie, F., Wan Zahari, W. Y., Martin, D., & Sidi, N. S. S. (2011). Application of Facilities Management ( FM ) Helpdesk in Higher Educational Institutions in Malaysia. In 2011 International Conference on Management and Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 6, pp. 37–41).
Sinopoli, J. (2009). How Do We Measure The Performance Of A Building ? Smart Buildings LLC. Retrieved May 10, 2013, from http://www.smart-buildings.com/uploads/1/1/4/3/11439474/howdowemeasure0809.pdf
Thompson, B. P., & Bank, L. C. (2007). Risk Perception in Performance-Based Building Design and Applications to Terrorism-Resistant Design, (February), 61–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:1(61)
Wolski, A., Dembsey, N. A., & Meacham, B. J. (2000). Accommodating perceptions of risk in performance-based building “re-safety” code development. Fire Safety Journal, 34, 297–309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-7112(00)00003-5
Wong, A. K. D., Wong, F. K. W., & Nadeem, A. (2011). Government roles in implementing building information modelling systems: Comparison between Hong Kong and the United States. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 11(1), 61–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14714171111104637
Wong, N. H., & Jan, W. L. S. (2003). Total building performance evaluation of academic institution in Singapore. Building and Environment, 38(1), 161–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(02)00021-5
Woods, J. E. (2008). Expanding the Principles of Performance to Sustainable Buildings. Real Estate Issues, 33(3), 37–46.
Zalejska-Jonsson, A. (2012). Evaluation of low-energy and conventional residential buildings from occupants’ perspective. Building and Environment, 58, 135–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.07.002
Zimmerman, A., & Martin, M. (2001). Post-occupancy evaluation: benefits and barriers. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 168–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210010016857
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Natasha Khalil, Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman, Mohamad Rizal Baharum, Husrul Nizam Husin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
